Every year, about this time, the media make a big splash about “Record Store Day” and nerdy middle aged men pile into record shops everywhere to (select from below):
- Support their local recorded music retailer – and hope that they will stay in business for another year.
- Snag a couple of RSD exclusives, these being records that you always wanted and/or didn’t know what you wanted, to be loved and cherished.
- Snag a couple of RSD exclusives, and then sell them on E-Bay at a massive profit.
- Complain to anybody within ear reach about how RSD is just a big corporate rip-off, and wander out of the shop having annoyed everybody and bought nothing.
- Silently complain to yourself that RSD has become a corporate rip-off, but buy a couple of items to support your local shop.
- Pay outrageous amounts of money for (not very collectable) tat.
- Pay outrageous amounts of money for stuff that would have been released, likely at a lower price, anyway.
- Ponder paying outrageous amounts of money for a “limited release” record that might or might not sell out rapidly – a lot of last year’s RSD releases are piled up on shelves in record shops around the world, and often find their way to Amazon – seriously discounted.
I consider RSD to be transactional – I know I am paying far too much for any record that I buy – some of which I would never have bought – but I see it as a direct subsidy to my local record shop to provide me with the pleasure of “crate digging” intermittently for the next 12 months.
I visited a number of shops in an around RSD 2019 – mostly selling the same stuff. There were a number of records that I would have bought – if they had been priced reasonably – Yazoo, the Rolling Stones (Big hits volume 1 & 2), the Emmylou Harris box set, Frank Black’s solo albums, Tangerine Dream, CSNY,Fleetwood Mac, Badfinger, Frank Zappa, Charlie Parker with strings (outtakes), Black Rose by Thin Lizzy – probably the only one that I regret not buying (all in excess of Euro 30). There were a couple of albums released as picture discs that I would have bought on standard vinyl (I only have one picture disc – Lateralus by Tool, they generally sound terrible). I would have like the Bill Evans live in Ronnie Scott’s 2 x LP release, but it didn’t come our way. The Roxy Music remixes were
Anyway this year I bought (none of this terribly collectable):
- The King – Teenage Fanclub
- Steve McQueen Acoustic – Prefab Sprout
- Honeyman (live in 1973) – Tim Buckley
- Astral Weeks Outtakes – Van Morrison
- Cold Trumpet – Chet Baker
- Us and Us Only – Charlatans
The major disappointment about RSD is the sheer volume of “dad rock” – i.e. music targeted at the classic rock audience, with very little material from bands & artist from the past 20 years. Also, where is all the jazz?

Sitting on my sofa I realized that I have spent the past 40 years collecting vast quantities of LPs, tapes and CDs, not to mention Blu-Ray audio discs, SACDs, DVD-A and high resolution files – and all I have to show it is a lot of clutter and an empty wallet. Once you acquire Roon integrated with Qobuz – you have reached sight of digital audio nirvana. While there are few things as pleasurable in life as listening to, for example, a perfectly pressed Music Matters Blue Note LP, the ability to stream the same recording in high res straight into your hi fi system is pretty close. Of course, with Roon you can stream it to any wireless device in the house (including your tv); with any of the premium streaming services you can bring a compressed version with you on your smartphone. It is simply stunning.
Due to the sheer crapness of modern rock, indie, folk, electronic music, I spent the winter and early spring listening almost exclusively to jazz. I principally listened to a number of artists whose music I had accumulated but to whom I had given little focus: Eric Dolphy, Art Pepper, Gerry Mulligan, Lee Konitz, Stan Getz and Bill Evans. For some reason I have long been slightly prejudiced against west coast jazz – due to its whiteness and purported “cool” vibe. Big mistake. The trigger for my interest was a CD box set that I bought several years ago – called
I couldn’t resist it – the email from music direct that announced the release of “The Nightfly” from Mobile Fidelity – using UltraDisc One Step. The ultimate luxury edition – even though I can’t stand 45rpm records (they sound great – but you no sooner sit down than you’re up again flipping the record). Bear in mind that I already have 2 vinyl versions (my original 80s record that still sounds great and a newer reissue that I received as a gift and haven’t played yet), 2 DVDA versions, 2 CDs and another vinyl copy in the “Cheap X-Mas” box set. It sounds good – (and I’ll talk about the one step process in a different post) yes – but that is not the point of my post.
s I eagerly awaited my copy of “The Nightfly”, I pondered how low a number I would get – surely below 1000, hopefully lower than 500. In fact, my copy is number 35xx – about as “collectable” as any random vinyl release (which probably number less than 5000). In early December I went to my local record shop and picked up a copy of U2’s “Songs of Experience” – superdeluxe box – numbered 12,xxx. A few minutes later, I went into the other, now closed, store – and there was a copy on the shelf – numbered 9xxx. Arrragh – that was 3000 copies later. For a moment, I pondered a return of the one I bought – and then realized how ridiculous the whole situation actually was. Firstly, if you believe in this numbered mumbo jumbo – only the first couple of hundred would be in any wall collectable – the lower the better. Second – what the heck does the number actually mean?
I have no idea how many copies of Super Deluxe Songs of Experience were produced – maybe 30 or 40K (maybe 13K!) – but the numbering must be specific to the box. There is no difference in boxing from one box to another, nor presumably anything inside the box except the vinyl records. So, if the numbering was to matter, then there would have to be a correlation between the number and the quality of the record. Does anybody really believe that box number 875 contains the 875th record pressed? Absolutely not – for all we know it was the 1875th record pressed – presuming the pressing plant(s) pressed up all of the albums in one large batch. The boxes were likely made and numbered elsewhere. Also, presuming that the stampers punch out fewer than 1000 albums each (maybe 500 or 600), even if they were sequential in pressing order, clearly album 1375 would be a fresher pressing than number 575. But, of course, if you believe in the whole “hot stamper” thing, then there is a massive difference in the quality of pressing from one to the next. So the number means NOTHING. I seem to be incapable of getting hold of any record with a low number – but I have a few Mobile Fidelity records that are numbered below 1000 and below 500 (Tom Waits and Crystal Gayle, Elvis Costello), some in the 1000s (Lynyrd Skyynrd, Allman Bros, Miles Davis) and some in the 10,000s (Bob Dylan – Blood On The Tracks). The lower numbered pressings don’t sound appreciably better to me. Moreover, I have records from the 1970s and 1980s that I bought back then, on 120g or 140g that sound significantly better than the modern 180g virgin vinyl (presumably digitally sourced) re-issue – where the number pressed would be fewer and the stampers more limited.
There has been a solid increase in vinyl records sales, year on year, since 2007. So, the “vinyl resurgence” has been going on for a decade. Every week, during that period, I have come across an article in a newspaper, magazine or on-line about how vinyl is saving the music industry. This is nonsense. The vinyl resurgence will plateau and then fade out, gradually. To understand this, you need to know just who buys vinyl records.
I confess, I have become fatalistic about record shops. A new one, Head Records, opened in Galway during the autumn, in a mediocre shopping center location. I am familiar to the brand – they had an excellent store in Belfast, and two ok stores in Dublin. The Galway outlet was bigger and they had an excellent range of CDs and vinyl – it really was a good store for those getting into vinyl. However, I found the place quite expensive, with very standard fare – no audiophile stuff, very limited Jazz etc – and my back catalogue is pretty full. I didn’t think that the store would last.